lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 10:02:13 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lars Povlsen
 <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>, Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
 Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
 Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] dt-bindings: mfd: syscon: Split and enforce
 documenting MFD children

On 20/05/2024 23:20, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 08:42:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Simple syscon nodes can be documented in common syscon.yaml, however
>> devices with simple-mfd compatible, thus with some children, should have
>> their own schema listing these children.  Such listing makes the binding
>> specific, allows better validation (so the incorrect child would not
>> appear in the simple-mfd node) and actually enforces repeated rule for
>> simple-mfd devices:
>>
>>   "simple-mfd" is only for simple devices, where the children do not
>>   depend on the parent.
>>
>> Currently the syscon+simple-mfd binding is quite broad and allows
>> any child or property, thus above rule cannot be enforced.
>>
>> Split the syscon.yaml binding into:
>> 1. Common syscon properties, used potentially by many bindings.
>> 2. Simple syscon devices (NO simple-mfd!).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>

..


>>  
>>  description: |
>>    System controller node represents a register region containing a set
>> @@ -19,122 +19,99 @@ description: |
>>  maintainers:
>>    - Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
>>  
>> -select:
>> -  properties:
>> -    compatible:
>> -      contains:
>> -        enum:
>> -          - syscon
>> -
>> -  required:
>> -    - compatible
>> -
> 
> Removing this is only going to work with v2024.04. The only way it 
> works for older versions is listing all the compatibles here. That's a 
> bit new for us to require it.

I'll keep it, in such case. Anyway its removal is not really related to
main concept of this patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ