[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<PAXPR83MB0559AF231AC39311553DE877B4EA2@PAXPR83MB0559.EURPRD83.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 09:13:07 +0000
From: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>
To: Zhu Yanjun <zyjzyj2000@...il.com>, Konstantin Taranov
<kotaranov@...ux.microsoft.com>, "sharmaajay@...rosoft.com"
<sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>, Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>, "jgg@...pe.ca"
<jgg@...pe.ca>, "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next v2 2/3] RDMA/mana_ib: Implement uapi to create
and destroy RC QP
> **C99_COMMENTS**
> C99 style single line comments (//) should not be used.
> Prefer the block comment style instead.
> Zhu Yanjun
Thanks, I will send this tomorrow then.
Surprisingly, the checkpatch with --strict does not catch that by default.
I read the script and found that to add that check one should use:
--ignore C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE
Konstantin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists