linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the refactor-heap tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 12:18:03 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, Kuan-Wei Chiu
 <visitorckw@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Matthew Mirvish <matthew@...2.xyz>, Bagas
 Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the refactor-heap tree with the
 block tree

Hi all,

On Thu, 9 May 2024 15:27:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the refactor-heap tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   drivers/md/bcache/bset.c
>   drivers/md/bcache/bset.h
>   drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
>   drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   3a861560ccb3 ("bcache: fix variable length array abuse in btree_iter")
> 
> from the block tree and commit:
> 
>   afa5721abaaa ("bcache: Remove heap-related macros and switch to generic min_heap")
> 
> from the refactor-heap tree.
> 
> Ok, these conflicts are too extensive, so I am dropping the refactor-heap
> tree for today.  I suggest you all get together and sort something out.

I am still dropping the refactor-heap tree ...
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped