linux-kernel - Re: [v2] platform/x86: ISST: fix use-after-free in tpmi_sst_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c158e0f4-fcbd-13a6-ee98-adc26160c3c2@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 13:56:00 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>, 
    Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>, 
    platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, 
    Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, 
    Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
    Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, 
    Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] platform/x86: ISST: fix use-after-free in
 tpmi_sst_dev_remove()

On Tue, 21 May 2024, Markus Elfring wrote:

> >>>>>> …
> >>>>>>> Fix this by reordering the kfree() post the dereference.
> …
> > We'll not waste our time in wordsmithing commit messages to perfection,
> 
> I hope that you would also like to avoid typos in change descriptions.

Now you start derailing this with off-topic references to hypothetical 
"typos".

> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n45
> 
> 
> > the current one is good enough as was stated to you already.
> 
> I dared to present some wording concerns according to the running patch review.

No, your latest replies were not anymore about wording concerns but 
complaining about process.

Your wording concerns were already replied but after that you kept on 
arguing.

-- 
 i.