[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e73c659-06a3-426c-99c0-eff896eb2323@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 09:52:32 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Christian Brauner
<brauner@...nel.org>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfs: Fix setting of BDP_ASYNC from iocb flags
On 5/21/24 9:49 AM, David Howells wrote:
> Fix netfs_perform_write() to set BDP_ASYNC if IOCB_NOWAIT is set rather
> than if IOCB_SYNC is not set. It reflects asynchronicity in the sense of
> not waiting rather than synchronicity in the sense of not returning until
> the op is complete.
>
> Without this, generic/590 fails on cifs in strict caching mode with a
> complaint that one of the writes fails with EAGAIN. The test can be
> distilled down to:
>
> mount -t cifs /my/share /mnt -ostuff
> xfs_io -i -c 'falloc 0 8191M -c fsync -f /mnt/file
> xfs_io -i -c 'pwrite -b 1M -W 0 8191M' /mnt/file
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
However, I'll note that BDP_ASYNC is horribly named, it should be
BDP_NOWAIT instead. But that's a separate thing, fix looks correct
as-is.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists