[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240522-unpleased-morally-4dfdee2193af@spud>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 19:36:53 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: DT schema bindings conversion mentorships (was Re: [PATCH v5]
ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema)
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 07:05:24PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Dear Daniel,
>
> I see some contributions regarding Devicetree bindings which look like
> efforts of some mentorship programs.
I noticed that the 2024 dt-bindings gsoc wiki suggests using the wrong
dual license for bindings:
https://wiki.linuxfoundation.org/gsoc/2024-gsoc-device-tree-bindings#proposal_1convert_device_tree_bindings_to_dt_schema
The correct dual license is "GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause", not
BSD-3-Clause.
Thanks,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists