linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: qcom: Update the UIC Command Timeout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f9595b82-66f9-dce2-7fba-c42b1eacf962@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 13:56:30 -0700
From: "Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <quic_cang@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_nitirawa@...cinc.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
        <beanhuo@...ron.com>, <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam
	<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley"
	<jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "open list:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT"
	<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] scsi: ufs: qcom: Update the UIC Command Timeout

On 5/22/2024 11:18 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 5/22/24 00:01, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
>> Change the UIC command timeout to 2 seconds.
>> This extra time is to allow the uart occasionally print long
>> debug messages and logging from different modules during
>> product development. With the default hardcoded 500ms timeout,
>> the uart printing with interrupt disabled may cause the UIC command
>> interrupt get starved, resulting in a UIC command timeout and
>> eventually a watchdog timeout.
>> When a product development completes, the vendors may
>> select a different UIC command timeout as desired.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bao D. Nguyen <quic_nguyenb@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 3 +++
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> index 79f8cb3..4649e0f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ enum {
>>   #define QCOM_UFS_MAX_GEAR 4
>>   #define QCOM_UFS_MAX_LANE 2
>> +#define QCOM_UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS 2000
>>   enum {
>>       MODE_MIN,
>> @@ -1111,6 +1112,8 @@ static int ufs_qcom_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>>           dev_warn(dev, "%s: failed to configure the testbus %d\n",
>>                   __func__, err);
>> +    hba->uic_cmd_timeout = QCOM_UIC_CMD_TIMEOUT_MS;
>> +
>>       return 0;
>>   out_variant_clear:
> 
> Given the description of patch 1, the addressed issue is not specific to
> a single vendor. Is that correct?

The issue we are trying to address is not specific to a single vendor.
Any vendor would have a freedom to choose the UIC command timeout. At 
different times during their product development, they can choose 
different UIC command timeout, or use the default 500ms. It's the 
flexibility we would like to give to vendors.

> 
> Since the described issue is only encountered during development, why to
> modify the UIC command timeout unconditionally?

The vendors can enjoy the default 500ms UIC timeout if they prefer.
As long as they don't write to hba->uic_cmd_timeout in the vendor's 
initialization routine, the default value of 500ms will be used.

Thanks,
Bao

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.