[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240522154607.bd5790c0b0dc642aefd3a05c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 15:46:07 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski
<luto@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov
<bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Mike Rapoport
<rppt@...nel.org>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/mm_init: use node's number of cpus in
deferred_page_init_max_threads
On Wed, 22 May 2024 16:38:01 -0400 Eric Chanudet <echanude@...hat.com> wrote:
> x86_64 is already using the node's cpu as maximum threads. Make that the
> default for all archs setting DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT.
>
> This returns to the behavior prior making the function arch-specific
> with commit ecd096506922 ("mm: make deferred init's max threads
> arch-specific").
>
It isn't clear to me what is the runtime effect of this change upon our
users. Can you please prepare a sentence which spells this out?
>
> ---
> Setting DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT and testing on a few arm64 platforms
> shows faster deferred_init_memmap completions:
>
> | | x13s | SA8775p-ride | Ampere R137-P31 | Ampere HR330 |
> | | Metal, 32GB | VM, 36GB | VM, 58GB | Metal, 128GB |
> | | 8cpus | 8cpus | 8cpus | 32cpus |
> |---------|-------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------|
> | threads | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) | ms (%) |
> |---------|-------------|--------------|-----------------|--------------|
> | 1 | 108 (0%) | 72 (0%) | 224 (0%) | 324 (0%) |
> | cpus | 24 (-77%) | 36 (-50%) | 40 (-82%) | 56 (-82%) |
The above is useful info, I'll hoist it into the main changelog.
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -2126,7 +2126,7 @@ deferred_init_memmap_chunk(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn,
> __weak int __init
> deferred_page_init_max_threads(const struct cpumask *node_cpumask)
> {
> - return 1;
> + return max_t(int, cpumask_weight(node_cpumask), 1);
> }
It's an unrelated cleanup , but that could be
max(cpumask_weight(node_cpumask), 1U);
and the function could/should return unsigned.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists