[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240522001817.619072-15-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 01:17:09 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul@....org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jalliste@...zon.co.uk,
sveith@...zon.de,
zide.chen@...el.com,
Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 14/21] KVM: x86: Kill cur_tsc_{nsec,offset,write} fields
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
These pointlessly duplicate the last_tsc_{nsec,offset,write} values.
The only place they were used was where the TSC is stable and a new vCPU
is being synchronized to the previous setting, in which case the 'last_'
value is definitely identical.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 ---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 19 ++++++++-----------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index b01c1d000fff..7d06f389a607 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -1354,9 +1354,6 @@ struct kvm_arch {
u32 last_tsc_khz;
u64 last_tsc_offset;
u64 last_tsc_scaling_ratio;
- u64 cur_tsc_nsec;
- u64 cur_tsc_write;
- u64 cur_tsc_offset;
u64 cur_tsc_generation;
int nr_vcpus_matched_tsc;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 6ec43f39bdb0..ab5d55071253 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2713,11 +2713,9 @@ static void __kvm_synchronize_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset, u64 tsc,
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->arch.tsc_write_lock);
/*
- * We also track th most recent recorded KHZ, write and time to
- * allow the matching interval to be extended at each write.
+ * Track the last recorded kHz (and associated scaling ratio for
+ * calculating the guest TSC), and offset.
*/
- kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec = ns;
- kvm->arch.last_tsc_write = tsc;
kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz = vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz;
kvm->arch.last_tsc_scaling_ratio = vcpu->arch.l1_tsc_scaling_ratio;
kvm->arch.last_tsc_offset = offset;
@@ -2736,10 +2734,9 @@ static void __kvm_synchronize_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset, u64 tsc,
*
* These values are tracked in kvm->arch.cur_xxx variables.
*/
+ kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec = ns;
+ kvm->arch.last_tsc_write = tsc;
kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation++;
- kvm->arch.cur_tsc_nsec = ns;
- kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = tsc;
- kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset;
kvm->arch.nr_vcpus_matched_tsc = 0;
} else if (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation != kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation) {
kvm->arch.nr_vcpus_matched_tsc++;
@@ -2747,8 +2744,8 @@ static void __kvm_synchronize_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 offset, u64 tsc,
/* Keep track of which generation this VCPU has synchronized to */
vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation;
- vcpu->arch.this_tsc_nsec = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_nsec;
- vcpu->arch.this_tsc_write = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write;
+ vcpu->arch.this_tsc_nsec = kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec;
+ vcpu->arch.this_tsc_write = kvm->arch.last_tsc_write;
kvm_track_tsc_matching(vcpu);
}
@@ -2825,8 +2822,8 @@ static void kvm_synchronize_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *user_value)
data = kvm->arch.last_tsc_write;
if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) {
- offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset;
- ns = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_nsec;
+ offset = kvm->arch.last_tsc_offset;
+ ns = kvm->arch.last_tsc_nsec;
} else {
/*
* ... unless the TSC is unstable and has to be
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists