linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers: regulator: tps6594-regulator: Correct multi-phase configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 09:52:01 +0530
From: Neha Malcom Francis <n-francis@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <jneanne@...libre.com>, <eblanc@...libre.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nm@...com>, <vigneshr@...com>,
        <u-kumar1@...com>, <j-keerthy@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: regulator: tps6594-regulator: Correct
 multi-phase configuration

Hi Mark

On 21-May-24 4:57 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 03:17:58PM +0530, Neha Malcom Francis wrote:
>> According to the TPS6594 PMIC Manual (linked) 8.3.2.1.4 Multi-Phase BUCK
>> Regulator Configurations section, the PMIC ignores all the other bucks'
>> except the primary buck's regulator registers. This is BUCK1 for
>> configurations BUCK12, BUCK123 and BUCK1234 while it is BUCK3 for
>> BUCK34. Correct the registers mapped for these configurations
>> accordingly.
> 
> Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the
> subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and
> make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing.
> There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone.

Sorry about this, thanks for explaining; I will definitely take care the 
next time.

-- 
Thanking You
Neha Malcom Francis