[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240522001817.619072-17-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 01:17:11 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paul Durrant <paul@....org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jalliste@...zon.co.uk,
sveith@...zon.de,
zide.chen@...el.com,
Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v3 16/21] KVM: x86: Factor out kvm_use_master_clock()
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
Both kvm_track_tsc_matching() and pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy() make a
decision about whether the KVM clock should be in master clock mode.
They use *different* criteria for the decision though. This isn't really
a problem; it only has the potential to cause unnecessary invocations of
KVM_REQ_MASTERCLOCK_UPDATE if the masterclock was disabled due to TSC
going backwards, or the guest using the old MSR. But it isn't pretty.
Factor the decision out to a single function. And document the historical
reason why it's disabled for guests that use the old MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index e21b8c075bf6..437412b36cae 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2518,6 +2518,27 @@ static inline bool gtod_is_based_on_tsc(int mode)
}
#endif
+static bool kvm_use_master_clock(struct kvm *kvm)
+{
+ struct kvm_arch *ka = &kvm->arch;
+
+ /*
+ * The 'old kvmclock' check is a workaround (from 2015) for a
+ * SUSE 2.6.16 kernel that didn't boot if the system_time in
+ * its kvmclock was too far behind the current time. So the
+ * mode of just setting the reference point and allowing time
+ * to proceed linearly from there makes it fail to boot.
+ * Despite that being kind of the *point* of the way the clock
+ * is exposed to the guest. By coincidence, the offending
+ * kernels used the old MSR_KVM_SYSTEM_TIME, which was moved
+ * only because it resided in the wrong number range. So the
+ * workaround is activated for *all* guests using the old MSR.
+ */
+ return ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc &&
+ !ka->backwards_tsc_observed &&
+ !ka->boot_vcpu_runs_old_kvmclock;
+}
+
static void kvm_track_tsc_matching(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -2550,7 +2571,7 @@ static void kvm_track_tsc_matching(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* To use the masterclock, the host clocksource must be based on TSC
* and all vCPUs must have matching TSC frequencies.
*/
- bool use_master_clock = ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc &&
+ bool use_master_clock = kvm_use_master_clock(vcpu->kvm) &&
gtod_is_based_on_tsc(gtod->clock.vclock_mode);
/*
@@ -3096,9 +3117,7 @@ static void pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy(struct kvm *kvm)
&ka->master_cycle_now);
ka->use_master_clock = host_tsc_clocksource
- && ka->all_vcpus_matched_tsc
- && !ka->backwards_tsc_observed
- && !ka->boot_vcpu_runs_old_kvmclock;
+ && kvm_use_master_clock(kvm);
/*
* When TSC scaling is in use (which can thankfully only happen
--
2.44.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists