lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:02:37 +0800
From: Junyi Zhao <junyi.zhao@...ogic.com>
To: George Stark <gnstark@...utedevices.com>, kelvin.zhang@...ogic.com,
 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
 Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
 Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 "kernel@...utedevices.com" <kernel@...utedevices.com>
Subject: Re: [DMARC error][DKIM error] [PATCH v5 1/2] pwm: meson: Add support
 for Amlogic S4 PWM



On 2024/5/22 2:50, George Stark wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Hello Kelvin, Junyi
> 
> On 5/21/24 11:31, Kelvin Zhang via B4 Relay wrote:
>> From: Junyi Zhao <junyi.zhao@...ogic.com>
>>
>> This patch adds support for Amlogic S4 PWM.
> 
> Please take a look at
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.9/process/submitting-patches.html#describe-your-changes
> 
> It should be something like
> Add support for Amlogic S4 PWM.
> 
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Junyi Zhao <junyi.zhao@...ogic.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@...ogic.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 53 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> index b2f97dfb01bb..9fea28a51921 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
>> @@ -460,6 +460,51 @@ static int 
>> meson_pwm_init_channels_meson8b_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>>       return meson_pwm_init_clocks_meson8b(chip, mux_parent_data);
>>   }
>>
>> +static void meson_pwm_s4_put_clk(void *data)
>> +{
>> +     int i;
>> +     struct meson_pwm *meson;
>> +     struct meson_pwm_channel *channel;
>> +
>> +     meson = (struct meson_pwm *)data;
> You can initialize meson variable along with declaration; type casting
> is not needed
> 
>> +     for (i = 0; i < MESON_NUM_PWMS; i++) {
>> +             channel = &meson->channels[i];
>> +             clk_put(channel->clk);
>> +     }
> you can save 3 lines just by using clk_put(meson->channels[i].clk);
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int meson_pwm_init_channels_meson_s4(struct pwm_chip *chip)
>> +{
>> +     int i, ret;
>> +     struct device *dev = pwmchip_parent(chip);
>> +     struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>> +     struct meson_pwm *meson = to_meson_pwm(chip);
>> +     struct meson_pwm_channel *channel;
>> +
>> +     for (i = 0; i < MESON_NUM_PWMS; i++) {
>> +             channel = &meson->channels[i];
>> +             channel->clk = of_clk_get(np, i);
>> +             if (IS_ERR(channel->clk)) {
>> +                     ret = PTR_ERR(channel->clk);
>> +                     dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to get clk\n");
>> +                     goto err;
>> +             }
>> +     }
>> +     ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, meson_pwm_s4_put_clk, meson);
>> +     if (ret)
>> +             return ret;
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +
>> +err:
>> +     while (--i >= 0) {
>> +             channel = &meson->channels[i];
>> +             clk_put(channel->clk);
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct meson_pwm_data pwm_meson8b_data = {
>>       .parent_names = { "xtal", NULL, "fclk_div4", "fclk_div3" },
>>       .channels_init = meson_pwm_init_channels_meson8b_legacy,
>> @@ -498,6 +543,10 @@ static const struct meson_pwm_data 
>> pwm_meson8_v2_data = {
>>       .channels_init = meson_pwm_init_channels_meson8b_v2,
>>   };
>>
>> +static const struct meson_pwm_data pwm_meson_s4_data = {
>> +     .channels_init = meson_pwm_init_channels_meson_s4,
>> +};
>> +
> according to already existing soc-specific named vars and functions
> new names should be
> static const struct meson_pwm_data pwm_s4_data
> and
> static int meson_pwm_init_channels_s4(struct pwm_chip *chip)
> 
>>   static const struct of_device_id meson_pwm_matches[] = {
>>       {
>>               .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-pwm-v2",
>> @@ -536,6 +585,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id 
>> meson_pwm_matches[] = {
>>               .compatible = "amlogic,meson-g12a-ao-pwm-cd",
>>               .data = &pwm_g12a_ao_cd_data
>>       },
>> +     {
>> +             .compatible = "amlogic,meson-s4-pwm",
>> +             .data = &pwm_meson_s4_data
>> +     },
>>       {},
>>   };
>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_pwm_matches);
>>
> 
> -- 
> Best regards
> George
Thks for your suggestion. i will check it.
--
Junyi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ