lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 11:23:28 +0200
From: Alexandre Mergnat <amergnat@...libre.com>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
 Flora Fu <flora.fu@...iatek.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
 Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/16] ASoC: mediatek: mt8365: Add ADDA DAI support



On 20/05/2024 12:27, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> +int mt8365_dai_disable_adda_on(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
>> +{
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +    struct mt8365_afe_private *afe_priv = afe->platform_priv;
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&afe_priv->afe_ctrl_lock, flags);
>> +
>> +    adda_afe_on_ref_cnt--;
>> +    if (adda_afe_on_ref_cnt == 0)
>> +        regmap_update_bits(afe->regmap, AFE_ADDA_UL_DL_CON0,
>> +                   AFE_ADDA_UL_DL_ADDA_AFE_ON,
>> +                   ~AFE_ADDA_UL_DL_ADDA_AFE_ON);
>> +    else if (adda_afe_on_ref_cnt < 0)
>> +        adda_afe_on_ref_cnt = 0;
> 
> Should we dev_warn() here? The refcount should never be less than zero - if it is,
> then there's some issue somewhere that must be solved.

Ok to add dev_warn, but I also want to keep "adda_afe_on_ref_cnt = 0;" for robustness, even if it 
shouldn't reach this case.

-- 
Regards,
Alexandre

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ