linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add specified fixed LDO VOUT property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b094ce68-9ce2-411d-99f2-1f143e4c3347@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 11:27:06 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, broonie@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 cy_huang@...htek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: dt-bindings: rtq2208: Add specified fixed
 LDO VOUT property

On 22/05/2024 11:03, Alina Yu wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:34:02PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 16/05/2024 11:20, Alina Yu wrote:
>>> As the fixed voltage for the LDO is outside the range of the adjustable voltage mode,
>>> the constraints for this scenario are not suitable to represent both modes.
>>> Therefore, A property is added to specify the fixed LDO VOUT.
>>>
>>> Examples of fixed LDO VOUT and adjustable LDO VOUT is also added to this version.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alina Yu <alina_yu@...htek.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> This is a v1 but I am pretty sure I saw it somewhere and there was
>> already some sort of discussion. Confused... :(
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
> 
> The discussion regarding this matter took place during v2 and v3.

So in the future?

> Due to the fixed LDO VOUT being outside the range of the adjustable one,
> a special-use property has been added to avoid overusing the constraints.

Hm, why exactly this is not a bool property? What are the benefits?

Best regards,
Krzysztof