lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1686c1e6-94c6-45c0-adc5-c05d49614d30@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 11:35:06 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: michael.nemanov@...com, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
 Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
 Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
 linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sabeeh Khan <sabeeh-khan@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] Add ti,cc33xx.yaml

On 21/05/2024 19:18, michael.nemanov@...com wrote:
> From: Michael Nemanov <michael.nemanov@...com>

Please use subject prefixes matching the subsystem. You can get them for
example with `git log --oneline -- DIRECTORY_OR_FILE` on the directory
your patch is touching. For bindings, the preferred subjects are
explained here:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.html#i-for-patch-submitters

Missing commit msg.

Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people
and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older
kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base
your patches on recent Linux kernel.

Tools like b4 or scripts/get_maintainer.pl provide you proper list of
people, so fix your workflow. Tools might also fail if you work on some
ancient tree (don't, instead use mainline), work on fork of kernel
(don't, instead use mainline) or you ignore some maintainers (really
don't). Just use b4 and everything should be fine, although remember
about `b4 prep --auto-to-cc` if you added new patches to the patchset.

You missed at least devicetree list (maybe more), so this won't be
tested by automated tooling. Performing review on untested code might be
a waste of time, thus I will skip this patch entirely till you follow
the process allowing the patch to be tested.

Please kindly resend and include all necessary To/Cc entries.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ