[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zk3YUJjJ34FYo5NJ@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:34:40 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] device property: introduce
fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped()
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:18:07AM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> Add a scoped version of fwnode_for_each_available_child_node() following
> the approach recently taken for other loops that handle child nodes like
> for_each_child_of_node_scoped() or device_for_each_child_node_scoped(),
> which are based on the __free() auto cleanup handler to remove the need
> for fwnode_handle_put() on early loop exits.
OK as long as we have users.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists