linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/head/64: level2_kernel_pgt's kernel area is built with _PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240522140614.fxe6tw6y5clrnve3@master>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 14:06:14 +0000
From: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/head/64: level2_kernel_pgt's kernel area is built
 with _PAGE_PRESENT set

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 23 2024 at 23:26, Wei Yang wrote:
>> The code is first introduced in 'commit 1ab60e0f72f7 ("[PATCH] x86-64:
>> Relocatable Kernel Support")'.  Then 'commit c88d71508e36b
>> ("x86/boot/64: Rewrite startup_64() in C")', convert it to c. And
>> 'commit 2aa85f246c181 ("x86/boot/64: Make level2_kernel_pgt pages
>> invalid outside kernel area")' limit the range from _text to _end.
>>
>> Originally, it does the check because the loop iterate the whole
>> level2_kernel_pgt, while currently it just fixup the kernel area. This
>> area is built with _PAGE_PRESENT set.
>
>What's the actual problem you are trying to solve?

Not a problem. It tries to remove some duplicate check.

>
>>  	/* fixup pages that are part of the kernel image */
>>  	for (; i <= pmd_index((unsigned long)_end); i++)
>> -		if (pmd[i] & _PAGE_PRESENT)
>> -			pmd[i] += load_delta;
>> +		pmd[i] += load_delta;
>
>Fixing up non-present PMDs is a pointless exercise.
>

Agree. While we are sure then range here must present.

The whole process looks like this

    pmd in [0, _text)
        unset _PAGE_PRESENT
    pmd in [_text, _end]
        fix up delta
    pmd in (_end, 256)
        unset _PAGE_PRESENT

Since we have compiled in _PAGE_PRESENT in this page table, it is not
necessary to check _PAGE_PRESENT again before fixing up delta.

BTW, if one entry between _text and _end is not present, we will failed to
fixing the kernel code pmd entry, which will lead to some problem.

>Thanks,
>
>        tglx

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me