lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 16:09:41 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, Oscar Salvador
 <osalvador@...e.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
 Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Pavel Tatashin
 <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm,memory_hotplug: Remove un-taken lock

On 21.05.24 14:57, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> It seems that [1] was acked, and the a v2 was written[2] which improved
> upon it, but got bogged down in discussion of other topics, so the
> improvements were not included. Then [1] got merged as commit
> 27cacaad16c5 ("mm,memory_hotplug: drop unneeded locking") and we ended
> up with locks that get taken for read but never for write.
> 
> So, let's remove the read locking.
> 
> Compared to Oscar's original v2[2], I have added a READ_ONCE in
> page_outside_zone_boundaries; this is a substitute for the compiler
> barrier that was implied by read_seqretry(). I believe this is necessary
> to insure against UB, although the value being read here is only used
> for a printk so the stakes seem very low (and this is all debug code
> anyway). I believe a compiler barrier is also needed in zone_spans_pfn,
> but I'll address that in a separate patch.
> 
> That read_seqretry() also impleied a CPU-level memory barrier, which I
> don't think needs replacing: page_outside_zone_boundaries() is used in
> the alloc and free paths, but you can't allocate or free pages from
> the span that is in the middle of being added/removed by hotplug.
> 
> In other words, page_outside_zone_boundaries() doesn't require a
> strictly up-to-date view of spanned_pages, but I think it does require
> a value that was once/will eventually be correct, hence READ_ONCE.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210531093958.15021-1-osalvador@suse.de/T/#u
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210602091457.17772-3-osalvador@suse.de/#t
> 
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> Co-developed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/memory_hotplug.h | 35 -----------------------------------
>   include/linux/mmzone.h         | 23 +++++------------------
>   mm/mm_init.c                   |  1 -
>   mm/page_alloc.c                | 10 +++-------
>   4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> index 7a9ff464608d..f9577e67e5ee 100644
> --- a/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> +++ b/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> @@ -141,31 +141,7 @@ bool mhp_supports_memmap_on_memory(void);
>   
>   /*
>    * Zone resizing functions
> - *
> - * Note: any attempt to resize a zone should has pgdat_resize_lock()
> - * zone_span_writelock() both held. This ensure the size of a zone
> - * can't be changed while pgdat_resize_lock() held.
>    */
> -static inline unsigned zone_span_seqbegin(struct zone *zone)
> -{
> -	return read_seqbegin(&zone->span_seqlock);
> -}
> -static inline int zone_span_seqretry(struct zone *zone, unsigned iv)
> -{
> -	return read_seqretry(&zone->span_seqlock, iv);
> -}
> -static inline void zone_span_writelock(struct zone *zone)
> -{
> -	write_seqlock(&zone->span_seqlock);
> -}
> -static inline void zone_span_writeunlock(struct zone *zone)
> -{
> -	write_sequnlock(&zone->span_seqlock);
> -}
> -static inline void zone_seqlock_init(struct zone *zone)
> -{
> -	seqlock_init(&zone->span_seqlock);
> -}
>   extern void adjust_present_page_count(struct page *page,
>   				      struct memory_group *group,
>   				      long nr_pages);
> @@ -251,17 +227,6 @@ static inline void pgdat_kswapd_lock_init(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>   	___page;				\
>    })
>   
> -static inline unsigned zone_span_seqbegin(struct zone *zone)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -static inline int zone_span_seqretry(struct zone *zone, unsigned iv)
> -{
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -static inline void zone_span_writelock(struct zone *zone) {}
> -static inline void zone_span_writeunlock(struct zone *zone) {}
> -static inline void zone_seqlock_init(struct zone *zone) {}
>   
>   static inline int try_online_node(int nid)
>   {
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 8f9c9590a42c..194ef7fed9d6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
>   #include <linux/threads.h>
>   #include <linux/numa.h>
>   #include <linux/init.h>
> -#include <linux/seqlock.h>
>   #include <linux/nodemask.h>
>   #include <linux/pageblock-flags.h>
>   #include <linux/page-flags-layout.h>
> @@ -896,18 +895,11 @@ struct zone {
>   	 *
>   	 * Locking rules:
>   	 *
> -	 * zone_start_pfn and spanned_pages are protected by span_seqlock.
> -	 * It is a seqlock because it has to be read outside of zone->lock,
> -	 * and it is done in the main allocator path.  But, it is written
> -	 * quite infrequently.
> -	 *
> -	 * The span_seq lock is declared along with zone->lock because it is
> -	 * frequently read in proximity to zone->lock.  It's good to
> -	 * give them a chance of being in the same cacheline.
> -	 *
> -	 * Write access to present_pages at runtime should be protected by
> -	 * mem_hotplug_begin/done(). Any reader who can't tolerant drift of
> -	 * present_pages should use get_online_mems() to get a stable value.
> +	 * Besides system initialization functions, memory-hotplug is the only
> +	 * user that can change zone's {spanned,present} pages at runtime, and
> +	 * it does so by holding the mem_hotplug_lock lock. Any readers who
> +	 * can't tolerate drift values should use {get,put}_online_mems to get
> +	 * a stable value.
>   	 */
>   	atomic_long_t		managed_pages;
>   	unsigned long		spanned_pages;
> @@ -930,11 +922,6 @@ struct zone {
>   	unsigned long		nr_isolate_pageblock;
>   #endif
>   
> -#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> -	/* see spanned/present_pages for more description */
> -	seqlock_t		span_seqlock;
> -#endif
> -
>   	int initialized;
>   
>   	/* Write-intensive fields used from the page allocator */
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index f72b852bd5b8..c725618aeb58 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -1383,7 +1383,6 @@ static void __meminit zone_init_internals(struct zone *zone, enum zone_type idx,
>   	zone->name = zone_names[idx];
>   	zone->zone_pgdat = NODE_DATA(nid);
>   	spin_lock_init(&zone->lock);
> -	zone_seqlock_init(zone);
>   	zone_pcp_init(zone);
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 2e22ce5675ca..5116a2b9ea6e 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -426,16 +426,12 @@ void set_pageblock_migratetype(struct page *page, int migratetype)
>   static int page_outside_zone_boundaries(struct zone *zone, struct page *page)
>   {
>   	int ret;
> -	unsigned seq;
>   	unsigned long pfn = page_to_pfn(page);
>   	unsigned long sp, start_pfn;
>   
> -	do {
> -		seq = zone_span_seqbegin(zone);
> -		start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
> -		sp = zone->spanned_pages;
> -		ret = !zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn);
> -	} while (zone_span_seqretry(zone, seq));
> +	start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
> +	sp = READ_ONCE(zone->spanned_pages);
> +	ret = !zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn);


The old seqlock guaranteed that we would have obtained consistent values 
here. start + spanned_pages defines a range. For example, growing a zone 
to the beginning implies that both ranges must be changed.

I do wonder if it might be better to instead have zone->zone_start_pfn 
and zone->zone_end_pfn. That way, both can be changed individually, not 
requiring adjustment of both to grow/shrink a zone at the beginning.

Then, using READ_ONCE() on both might actually make sense ...

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ