lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGzNGRm5i8zvnXiPzMg5=+tr9oyBcRA8LFvnmgGzE=MzSNTXug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 22:32:16 +0530
From: Mithil <bavishimithil@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>, 
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema

> Yep. And testing DTS should clearly show that conversion leads to
> incomplete binding.
>
> >
> >> I assume the DTS was validated with the binding. Isn't the case here?
>
> Mithil Bavishi,
> Are you sure you tested the DTS?

dt_binding_check did not give me any errors. Yeah the example is
different from how it is implemented in the kernel ie board specific
(omap4, omap5 etc). Should the example be changed according to that
dtsi then?


-- 
Best Regards,
Mithil

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ