linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e384272a-4dfe-4653-8983-6426f8803c84@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 19:07:34 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mithil <bavishimithil@...il.com>
Cc: Péter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>,
 linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ASoC: dt-bindings: omap-mcpdm: Convert to DT schema

On 22/05/2024 19:02, Mithil wrote:
>> Yep. And testing DTS should clearly show that conversion leads to
>> incomplete binding.
>>
>>>
>>>> I assume the DTS was validated with the binding. Isn't the case here?
>>
>> Mithil Bavishi,
>> Are you sure you tested the DTS?
> 
> dt_binding_check did not give me any errors. Yeah the example is
> different from how it is implemented in the kernel ie board specific
> (omap4, omap5 etc). Should the example be changed according to that
> dtsi then?

Binding needs to be adapted to match DTS or DTS has to be fixed to match
binding, depending which one is correct. Mention any changes done in the
binding which deviate from pure conversion of TXT->DT schema.

https://social.kernel.org/notice/Ai9hYRUKo8suzX3zNY

Best regards,
Krzysztof