linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 02/68] kselftest: Desecalate reporting of missing _GNU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 11:12:52 -0700
From: Edward Liaw <edliaw@...gle.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, shuah@...nel.org, 
	Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>, 
	Günther Noack <gnoack@...gle.com>, 
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, 
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, 
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, 
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, 
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/68] kselftest: Desecalate reporting of missing _GNU_SOURCE

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 11:02 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 5/22/24 20:28, John Hubbard wrote:
> > On 5/22/24 10:46 AM, Edward Liaw wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 4:21 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 12:56:48AM +0000, Edward Liaw wrote:
> > ...
> >>> You've not provided a Signed-off-by for this so people can't do anything
> >>> with it, please see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for
> >>> details on what this is and why it's important.
> >>
> >> Sorry, my mistake, I forgot to add it after cherry-picking.  If added
> >
> > Adding this to your .gitconfig would cover you for cases like this, I think
> > it's pretty common to do this:
> >
> > [format]
> >      signoff = true
> >
> >

Thanks Mark, I'll add that.

>
> Mark, Edward,
>
> Is this patch still necessary of the series is dropped?
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
>

No, it is not necessary anymore.