linux-kernel - Re: [v6 17/20] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add IBM Huygens BMC system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240523203339.GS2118490@ZenIV>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 21:33:39 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...econstruct.com.au>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Lakshmi Yadlapati <lakshmiy@...ibm.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [v6 17/20] ARM: dts: aspeed: Add IBM Huygens BMC system

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:46:48PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Would you like to mention in the changelog that a hardware description
> >> should be extended anyhow?
> >> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94
> >
> > You are talking absolute crap here. Stop harassing contributors with
> > your inane comments.
> 
> Why do you interpret my patch review contributions in this direction
> when the official Linux development documentation provides special advice
> on affected wording details?

Your "contributions" are garbage in general, and this thread is not an exception.
More specifically, you are picking an advice that is inapplicable, transforming
it into a question and "contributing" the result.

And your entire modus operandi fits that pattern - you spew random garbage and
expect the contributors to spend their time and efforts on checking if your
(contents-free) "advice" happens to make any sense.

That.  Is.  Worthless.

According to people who'd met you in person you *are* a member of our species,
and I can't exclude the possibility that in some other environments you might
be capable of sentience.  Unfortunately, the kernel development is clearly
not among those.