linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] Introduce mseal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 16:32:26 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: jeffxu@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com, sroettger@...gle.com,
	willy@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, usama.anjum@...labora.com,
	corbet@....net, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, surenb@...gle.com,
	merimus@...gle.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, jeffxu@...gle.com,
	jorgelo@...omium.org, groeck@...omium.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, pedro.falcato@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, deraadt@...nbsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] Introduce mseal

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:52:13PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:46:46AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 16:35:19 +0000 jeffxu@...omium.org wrote:
> > 
> > > This patchset proposes a new mseal() syscall for the Linux kernel.
> > 
> > I have not moved this into mm-stable for a 6.10 merge.  Mainly because
> > of the total lack of Reviewed-by:s and Acked-by:s.
> 
> Oh, I thought I had already reviewed it. FWIW, please consider it:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> 
> > The code appears to be stable enough for a merge.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> > It's awkward that we're in conference this week, but I ask people to
> > give consideration to the desirability of moving mseal() into mainline
> > sometime over the next week, please.
> 
> Yes please. :)

Is the plan still to land this for 6.10? With the testing it's had in
-next and Liam's review, I think we're good to go?

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook