[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e769b8a5-dd11-4cf5-95bb-4399dd836113@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 09:42:54 +0800
From: Pu Lehui <pulehui@...wei.com>
To: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>
CC: <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>, <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
<luke.r.nels@...il.com>, <xi.wang@...il.com>, <bjorn@...nel.org>,
<ast@...nel.org>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>,
<martin.lau@...ux.dev>, <eddyz87@...il.com>, <song@...nel.org>,
<yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, <john.fastabend@...il.com>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<sdf@...gle.com>, <haoluo@...gle.com>, <jolsa@...nel.org>,
<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <haicheng.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv, bpf: Use STACK_ALIGN macro for size rounding up
On 2024/5/22 13:45, Xiao Wang wrote:
> Use the macro STACK_ALIGN that is defined in asm/processor.h for stack size
> rounding up, just like bpf_jit_comp32.c does.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Wang <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
It met a patching conflict. I think you should target for the bpf-next tree.
https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/pull/7080
Powered by blists - more mailing lists