linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v19 039/130] KVM: TDX: initialize VM with TDX specific parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <23559fcc-97ab-47a2-8832-699c05c4a387@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 12:37:49 +0200
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
 Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, chen.bo@...el.com, hang.yuan@...el.com,
 tina.zhang@...el.com, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 039/130] KVM: TDX: initialize VM with TDX specific
 parameters

On 23.05.24 12:35, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 07:25:01PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 05:00:19PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>>> On 17.05.24 16:53, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>>> On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>>>> On 17.05.24 16:32, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:25:41AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
>>>>>>> @@ -725,6 +967,17 @@ static int __init tdx_module_setup(void)
>>>>>>>     	tdx_info->nr_tdcs_pages = tdcs_base_size / PAGE_SIZE;
>>>>>>> +	/*
>>>>>>> +	 * Make TDH.VP.ENTER preserve RBP so that the stack unwinder
>>>>>>> +	 * always work around it.  Query the feature.
>>>>>>> +	 */
>>>>>>> +	if (!(tdx_info->features0 & MD_FIELD_ID_FEATURES0_NO_RBP_MOD) &&
>>>>>>> +	    !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it supposed to be IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER). "!" shouldn't
>>>>>> be here.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I don't think so.
>>>>>
>>>>> With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER %rbp is being saved and restored, so there is no
>>>>> problem in case the seamcall is clobbering it.
>>>>
>>>> Could you check setup_tdparams() in your tree?
>>>>
>>>> Commit
>>>>
>>>> [SEAM-WORKAROUND] KVM: TDX: Don't use NO_RBP_MOD for backward compatibility
>>>>
>>>> in my tree comments out the setting TDX_CONTROL_FLAG_NO_RBP_MOD.
>>>>
>>>> I now remember there was problem in EDK2 using RBP. So the patch is
>>>> temporary until EDK2 is fixed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have the following line in setup_tdparams() (not commented out):
>>>
>>> 	td_params->exec_controls = TDX_CONTROL_FLAG_NO_RBP_MOD;
>>
>> Could you check if it is visible from the guest side?
> 
> Jürgen, have you tried it?
> 

No, I'm not yet at the point where I can boot a guest successfully.


Juergen