linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Address clang -Wimplicit-fallthrough in vsprintf()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240523115734.GAZk8vLgzOzD8Tv9pq@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 13:57:34 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Address clang -Wimplicit-fallthrough in
 vsprintf()

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 08:18:33AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> There was a patch to make Clang match GCC's behavior a few years ago but
> I think Kees made a good argument that GCC's behavior leaves potential
> bugs on the table, so that was not pursued further.
> 
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D91895#2417170

Really? Maybe I'm being dense but I don't see real bugs there... I see
readability issues. :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette