linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Allow platform vendors to set rtt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zk8-rwjFvgP714Mn@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 06:03:43 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
	Peter Wang <peter.wang@...iatek.com>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] scsi: ufs: Allow platform vendors to set rtt

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 03:58:25PM +0300, Avri Altman wrote:
> Allow platform vendors to take precedence having their own rtt
> negotiation mechanism.  This makes sense because the host controller's
> nortt characteristic may vary among vendors.

Platform vendors have absolutelyt no business saying anything.

Fortunately that's not what you're actually doing, but I really don't
understand your vendor fetish.