[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d90d565-c156-4e4c-8a16-f32aa73fc809@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 09:42:39 -0400
From: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@...hat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Chaitanya Kulkarni
<chaitanyak@...dia.com>, "emilne@...hat.com" <emilne@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
"kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jrani@...estorage.com" <jrani@...estorage.com>,
"randyj@...estorage.com" <randyj@...estorage.com>,
"hare@...nel.org" <hare@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: multipath: Implemented new iopolicy
"queue-depth"
On 5/23/24 02:28, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> As presented at LSF by Daniel; ALUA support (and, with that, multipath
> support) is one of the topics to be implemented for blktests.
> And without that we can't have a meaningful QD test.
So as a part of this patch you want a blktest that verifies queue-depth multipathing?
Or are your just tying acceptance of this patch to a blktest that tests multipath testing over all?
Seems to me you have a patch designed to do that...
https://github.com/osandov/blktests/pull/114
/John
Powered by blists - more mailing lists