linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: multipath: Implemented new iopolicy "queue-depth"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 09:42:39 -0400
From: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@...hat.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Chaitanya Kulkarni
 <chaitanyak@...dia.com>, "emilne@...hat.com" <emilne@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
 "hch@....de" <hch@....de>, "sagi@...mberg.me" <sagi@...mberg.me>,
 "kbusch@...nel.org" <kbusch@...nel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "jrani@...estorage.com" <jrani@...estorage.com>,
 "randyj@...estorage.com" <randyj@...estorage.com>,
 "hare@...nel.org" <hare@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] nvme: multipath: Implemented new iopolicy
 "queue-depth"


On 5/23/24 02:28, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> As presented at LSF by Daniel; ALUA support (and, with that, multipath 
> support) is one of the topics to be implemented for blktests.
> And without that we can't have a meaningful QD test.

So as a part of this patch you want a blktest that verifies queue-depth multipathing?

Or are your just tying acceptance of this patch to a blktest that tests multipath testing over all?

Seems to me you have a patch designed to do that...

https://github.com/osandov/blktests/pull/114

/John