[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c14a151-25c9-41f5-af65-d2a8ffe548fa@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 09:31:51 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Xiaojian Du <Xiaojian.Du@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
jpoimboe@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, kai.huang@...el.com, ray.huang@....com,
rafael@...nel.org, Perry.Yuan@....com, gautham.shenoy@....com,
Borislav.Petkov@....com, mario.limonciello@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/cpufeatures: Add AMD FAST CPPC feature flag
On 5/22/24 23:16, Xiaojian Du wrote:
> #define X86_FEATURE_BHI_CTRL (21*32+ 2) /* "" BHI_DIS_S HW control available */
> #define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_HW (21*32+ 3) /* "" BHI_DIS_S HW control enabled */
> #define X86_FEATURE_CLEAR_BHB_LOOP_ON_VMEXIT (21*32+ 4) /* "" Clear branch history at vmexit using SW loop */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_FAST_CPPC (21*32 + 5) /* "" AMD Fast CPPC */
It'd be nice to expand the CPPC acronym at least _once_.
Also, this is used _once_ at boot and not exposed in /proc/cpuinfo. Is
it even worth defining an X86_FEATURE_ for it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists