[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zk_63rrDJFhN1Y1q@google.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 02:26:38 +0000
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To: Ben Walsh <ben@...nut.com>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>, Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
"Dustin L. Howett" <dustin@...ett.net>,
Kieran Levin <ktl@...me.work>,
Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] platform/chrome: cros_ec_lpc: Correct ACPI name for
Framework Laptop
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 07:42:00PM +0100, Ben Walsh wrote:
> Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org> writes:
>
> > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:56:30AM +0100, Ben Walsh wrote:
> >> Framework Laptops' ACPI exposes the EC as name "PNP0C09". Use this to
> >> find the device. This makes it easy to find the AML mutex via the
> >> ACPI_COMPANION device.
> >>
> >> The name "PNP0C09" is part of the ACPI standard, not Chrome-specific,
> >> so only recognise the device if the DMI data is recognised too.
> >
> > I don't quite understand the statement. Why it needs DMI data?
>
> There are lots of computers with EC chips with ACPI name "PNP0C09"
> because it's part of the ACPI standard (for example I have an Intel NUC
> with one of these). Most of them don't support the cros_ec protocol, so
> the cros_ec driver should ignore these chips. The Framework EC is
> unusual in that it's called "PNP0C09" and supports the cros_ec protocol.
>
> Before these patches, the cros_ec code just ignored PNP0C09 because it
> wasn't in the match table. The cros_ec_lpc_init logic looked like:
>
> * dmi_match => ok
> * acpi_name == "GOOG0004" => ok
> * otherwise fail.
>
> After the patch, cros_ec_lpc_init still has this behaviour. We have
> "PNP0C09" in the match table so the driver gets hooked up correctly
> with the right "ACPI_COMPANION" device, but we don't allow the match
> to proceed unless we have the DMI data indicating it's a Framework EC.
>From the context you provided, instead of matching "PNP0C09" in the driver,
it makes more sense to me (for Framework EC):
* Mainly use DMI match.
* Add a quirk for looking up (acpi_get_devices()?) and binding
(e.g. ACPI_COMPANION_SET()) the `adev` in cros_ec_lpc_probe().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists