linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 0/9] Nginx refcount scalability issue with Apparmor enabled and potential solutions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAGudoHEycK3iTO2Rrsqr56_Lm69rCzMRaYz11NLrOcn5gKB3RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 23:10:16 +0200
From: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@....com>, paul@...l-moore.com, jmorris@...ei.org, 
	serge@...lyn.com, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>, 
	"Shukla, Santosh" <Santosh.Shukla@....com>, "Narayan, Ananth" <Ananth.Narayan@....com>, 
	raghavendra.kodsarathimmappa@....com, koverstreet@...gle.com, 
	paulmck@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, vinicius.gomes@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] Nginx refcount scalability issue with Apparmor enabled
 and potential solutions

On Fri, Mar 8, 2024 at 9:09 PM John Johansen
<john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/2/24 02:23, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> > On 2/9/24, John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com> wrote:
> >> On 2/6/24 20:40, Neeraj Upadhyay wrote:
> >>> Gentle ping.
> >>>
> >>> John,
> >>>
> >>> Could you please confirm that:
> >>>
> >>> a. The AppArmor refcount usage described in the RFC is correct?
> >>> b. Approach taken to fix the scalability issue is valid/correct?
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hi Neeraj,
> >>
> >> I know your patchset has been waiting on review for a long time.
> >> Unfortunately I have been very, very busy lately. I will try to
> >> get to it this weekend, but I can't promise that I will be able
> >> to get the review fully done.
> >>
> >
> > Gentle prod.
> >
> > Any chances of this getting reviewed in the foreseeable future? Would
> > be a real bummer if the patchset fell through the cracks.
> >
>
> yes, sorry I have been unavailable for the last couple of weeks. I am
> now back, I have a rather large backlog to try catching up on but this
> is has an entry on the list.
>

So where do we stand here?

-- 
Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>