[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240524091310.1430048-7-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 17:13:03 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <tony.luck@...el.com>, <bp@...en8.de>
CC: <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/13] mm/memory-failure: remove confusing initialization to count
It's meaningless and confusing to init local variable count to 1.
Remove it. No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/memory-failure.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
index c09e1bf83682..be9bda281d91 100644
--- a/mm/memory-failure.c
+++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
@@ -2573,7 +2573,7 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
struct folio *folio;
struct page *p;
int ret = -EBUSY, ghp;
- unsigned long count = 1;
+ unsigned long count;
bool huge = false;
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(unpoison_rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
--
2.33.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists