linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] iio: imu: adis16475: Re-define ADIS16475

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ccfe084339360695edb5ae774a3bc67b1781c95.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 12:47:38 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Ramona Gradinariu <ramona.bolboaca13@...il.com>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jic23@...nel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, 
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, nuno.sa@...log.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] iio: imu: adis16475: Re-define ADIS16475_DATA

On Fri, 2024-05-24 at 12:00 +0300, Ramona Gradinariu wrote:
> Re-define ADIS16475_DATA such that it takes _has_fifo as parameter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramona Gradinariu <ramona.bolboaca13@...il.com>
> ---

I may be missing something but do we actually need to patches redefining the macro?
If I'm not missing nothing the first patch is only relevant for the new ADIS devices
which are added in patch 10. So maybe squash both patches changing the macro.

- Nuno Sá