[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04a1543d-4156-4048-b4ec-99240a43d4c4@xen.org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 14:26:05 +0100
From: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
<bristot@...hat.com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jalliste@...zon.co.uk, sveith@...zon.de,
zide.chen@...el.com, Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 10/21] KVM: x86: Fix software TSC upscaling in
kvm_update_guest_time()
On 22/05/2024 01:17, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
>
> There was some confusion in kvm_update_guest_time() when software needs
> to advance the guest TSC.
>
> In master clock mode, there are two points of time which need to be taken
> into account. First there is the master clock reference point, stored in
> kvm->arch.master_kernel_ns (and associated host TSC ->master_cycle_now).
> Secondly, there is the time *now*, at the point kvm_update_guest_time()
> is being called.
>
> With software TSC upscaling, the guest TSC is getting further and further
> ahead of the host TSC as time elapses. So at time "now", the guest TSC
> should be further ahead of the host, than it was at master_kernel_ns.
>
> The adjustment in kvm_update_guest_time() was not taking that into
> account, and was only advancing the guest TSC by the appropriate amount
> for master_kernel_ns, *not* the current time.
>
> Fix it to calculate them both correctly.
>
> Since the KVM clock reference point in master_kernel_ns might actually
> be *earlier* than the reference point used for the guest TSC
> (vcpu->last_tsc_nsec), this might lead to a negative delta. Fix the
> compute_guest_tsc() function to cope with negative numbers, which
> then means there is no need to force a master clock update when the
> guest TSC is written.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk > ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists