linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH (REPOST)] profiling: initialize prof_cpu_mask from profile_online

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <19563aef-ed63-47b6-94c4-079db1bf8576@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 22:28:20 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, paskripkin@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        glider@...gle.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        syzbot <syzbot+b1a83ab2a9eb9321fbdd@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (REPOST)] profiling: initialize prof_cpu_mask from
 profile_online_cpu()

On 2024/05/05 15:18, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2024/04/27 15:51, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>> Can somebody test this patch? I don't know how not using
>> cpu_possible_mask affects expected profile data collection
>> (especially when written to /sys/kernel/profiling interface
>> when some of CPUs are offline).
> 
> I confirmed that writing to /sys/kernel/profiling while some of
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$num/online are 0 will not affect profile data
> collection, for profile_online_cpu() is called (and corresponding bit is set)
> when /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu$num/online becomes 1. Thus, I consider that
> this patch itself is correct and safe.

Who can take this patch?