linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 13/21] KVM: x86: Improve synchronization in kvm_synchronize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04ec9d6c-e761-4cfc-a2fe-a2d7d398c334@xen.org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 15:03:35 +0100
From: Paul Durrant <xadimgnik@...il.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Thomas Gleixner
 <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
 Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
 Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
 Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
 <bristot@...hat.com>, Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
 Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jalliste@...zon.co.uk, sveith@...zon.de,
 zide.chen@...el.com, Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>,
 Chenyi Qiang <chenyi.qiang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 13/21] KVM: x86: Improve synchronization in
 kvm_synchronize_tsc()

On 22/05/2024 01:17, David Woodhouse wrote:
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
> 
> When synchronizing to an existing TSC (either by explicitly writing zero,
> or the legacy hack where the TSC is written within one second's worth of
> the previously written TSC), the last_tsc_write and last_tsc_nsec values
> were being misrecorded by __kvm_synchronize_tsc(). The *unsynchronized*
> value of the TSC (perhaps even zero) was bring recorded, along with the
> current time at which kvm_synchronize_tsc() was called. This could cause
> *subsequent* writes to fail to synchronize correctly.
> 
> Fix that by resetting {data, ns} to the previous values before passing
> them to __kvm_synchronize_tsc() when synchronization is detected. Except
> in the case where the TSC is unstable and *has* to be synthesised from
> the host clock, in which case attempt to create a nsec/tsc pair which is
> on the correct line.
> 
> Furthermore, there were *three* different TSC reads used for calculating
> the "current" time, all slightly different from each other. Fix that by
> using kvm_get_time_and_clockread() where possible and using the same
> host_tsc value in all cases.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>
> ---
>   arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant <paul@....org>