linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] Introduce mseal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wiKNsQck3eGc37Da7hAKDNL6S9viwV8ir8BFTu7dsig6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 08:19:59 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, jeffxu@...omium.org, jannh@...gle.com, 
	sroettger@...gle.com, willy@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, 
	usama.anjum@...labora.com, corbet@....net, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, 
	surenb@...gle.com, merimus@...gle.com, rdunlap@...radead.org, 
	jeffxu@...gle.com, jorgelo@...omium.org, groeck@...omium.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, pedro.falcato@...il.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, deraadt@...nbsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/5] Introduce mseal

On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 16:54, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> The testing and implementation review seem OK.  But from a higher-level
> perspective Linus doesn't seem to be on board(?).

Oh, I'm fine with mseal.

I wasn't fine with the insane "m*() system calls should be atomic"
discussion where Theo was just making shit up. I honestly don't think
mseal() needs it either.

               Linus