[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ory3biisuxsjdpcjxsvb42l3rjivkllnubbprjhhw4nml7v4yj@czrbcsyioj43>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 23:30:47 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...nico.ulisboa.pt>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jthies@...gle.com, bleung@...omium.org, abhishekpandit@...omium.org,
saranya.gopal@...el.com, lk@...e.de, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmalani@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] usb: typec: ucsi: Update optional notifications for
UCSI v2.0
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:58:19AM +0100, Diogo Ivo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> These two patches enable checking and enabling the new optional
> notification types defined in UCSI v2.0 and greater. For that, patch 1
> defines the new optional capability bits and patch 2 adds the logic for
> checking/enabling these new notification types.
>
> Diogo Ivo (2):
> usb: typec: ucsi: Add new capability bits
> usb: typec: ucsi: Enable UCSI v2.0 notifications
>
> drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.h | 8 +++++++-
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
You didn't declare dependency on [1], you didn't use --base when
formatting patches, so LKP has no way to know that there is a
dependency. In future please consider sending definitions together with
the patches actually using those defs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3filrg6mbh6m3galir7ew5juakd25uvksimr7mqd7uc5td3xza@fdvxcewozqeh
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists