| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 23:30:47 +0300 From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> To: Diogo Ivo <diogo.ivo@...nico.ulisboa.pt> Cc: heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jthies@...gle.com, bleung@...omium.org, abhishekpandit@...omium.org, saranya.gopal@...el.com, lk@...e.de, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pmalani@...omium.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] usb: typec: ucsi: Update optional notifications for UCSI v2.0 On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:58:19AM +0100, Diogo Ivo wrote: > Hello, > > These two patches enable checking and enabling the new optional > notification types defined in UCSI v2.0 and greater. For that, patch 1 > defines the new optional capability bits and patch 2 adds the logic for > checking/enabling these new notification types. > > Diogo Ivo (2): > usb: typec: ucsi: Add new capability bits > usb: typec: ucsi: Enable UCSI v2.0 notifications > > drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- > drivers/usb/typec/ucsi/ucsi.h | 8 +++++++- > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) You didn't declare dependency on [1], you didn't use --base when formatting patches, so LKP has no way to know that there is a dependency. In future please consider sending definitions together with the patches actually using those defs. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/3filrg6mbh6m3galir7ew5juakd25uvksimr7mqd7uc5td3xza@fdvxcewozqeh -- With best wishes Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists