lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZlGcfHD3ZCNKWDdr@rli9-mobl>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 16:08:28 +0800
From: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
CC: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
	<oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Andrew
 Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Memory Management List
	<linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: include/asm-generic/percpu.h:31:40: error: implicit declaration
 of function 'raw_smp_processor_id'

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 11:58:30AM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 12:31:18AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > head:   eb6a9339efeb6f3d2b5c86fdf2382cdc293eca2c
> > commit: 24e44cc22aa3112082f2ee23137d048c73ca96d5 mm: percpu: enable per-cpu allocation tagging
> > date:   4 weeks ago
> > config: mips-randconfig-r133-20240520 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240521/202405210052.DIrMXJNz-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
> > reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240521/202405210052.DIrMXJNz-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > 
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405210052.DIrMXJNz-lkp@intel.com/
> 
> I have a fix I'm testing for this but it's going to need a lot of
> randconfig build testing on all archs.
> 
> Philip, could 0day help out with that? I don't know how you schedule

Got it, we will cover this branch with randconfig build tests.

> which branches for which testing, and previously the memory allocation
> profiling didn't get enough build testing before Andrew merged it.

Sorry about this, we really need extend the test number to generate
more randconfigs.

> 
> Running my own build testing now, of course...
> 
> https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs.git fix_missing_include

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ