linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v20 06/12] fs, block: copy_file_range for def_blk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 09:09:27 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	martin.petersen@...cle.com, bvanassche@....org, hare@...e.de,
	damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, anuj20.g@...sung.com,
	joshi.k@...sung.com, nitheshshetty@...il.com, gost.dev@...sung.com,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 06/12] fs, block: copy_file_range for def_blk_ops for
 direct block device

On Mon, May 20, 2024 at 03:50:19PM +0530, Nitesh Shetty wrote:
> For direct block device opened with O_DIRECT, use blkdev_copy_offload to
> issue device copy offload, or use splice_copy_file_range in case
> device copy offload capability is absent or the device files are not open
> with O_DIRECT.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
> Signed-off-by: Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nitesh Shetty <nj.shetty@...sung.com>
> ---
>  block/fops.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/fops.c b/block/fops.c
> index 376265935714..5a4bba4f43aa 100644
> --- a/block/fops.c
> +++ b/block/fops.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/iomap.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/splice.h>
>  #include "blk.h"
>  
>  static inline struct inode *bdev_file_inode(struct file *file)
> @@ -754,6 +755,30 @@ static ssize_t blkdev_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t blkdev_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> +				      struct file *file_out, loff_t pos_out,
> +				      size_t len, unsigned int flags)
> +{
> +	struct block_device *in_bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file_in));
> +	struct block_device *out_bdev = I_BDEV(bdev_file_inode(file_out));
> +	ssize_t copied = 0;
> +
> +	if ((in_bdev == out_bdev) && bdev_max_copy_sectors(in_bdev) &&
> +	    (file_in->f_iocb_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) &&
> +	    (file_out->f_iocb_flags & IOCB_DIRECT)) {
> +		copied = blkdev_copy_offload(in_bdev, pos_in, pos_out, len,
> +					     NULL, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		if (copied < 0)
> +			copied = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		copied = splice_copy_file_range(file_in, pos_in + copied,
> +						 file_out, pos_out + copied,
> +						 len - copied);
> +	}

This should not fall back to a page cache copy.

We keep being told by application developers that if the fast
hardware/filesystem offload fails, then an error should be returned
so the application can determine what the fallback operation should
be.

It may well be that the application falls back to "copy through the
page cache", but that is an application policy choice, not a
something the kernel offload driver should be making mandatory.

Userspace has to handle copy offload failure anyway, so they a
fallback path regardless of whether copy_file_range() works on block
devices or not...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com