[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240526140139.17220-1-richard120310@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 22:01:39 +0800
From: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] lib/plist.c: Enforce memory ordering in plist_check_list
There exist an iteration over a plist in the function plist_check_list,
and memory dependency exists between variables "prev", "next" and
"prev->next". Consider plist is used scheduling subsystem, we should
guarantee the memory order between multiple processors.
Using macro "WRITE_ONCE()" can help us to ensure the memory ordering as
it was stated in "/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt".
Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@...il.com>
---
lib/plist.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/plist.c b/lib/plist.c
index 0d86ed7a7..2e51829d3 100644
--- a/lib/plist.c
+++ b/lib/plist.c
@@ -47,8 +47,8 @@ static void plist_check_list(struct list_head *top)
plist_check_prev_next(top, prev, next);
while (next != top) {
- prev = next;
- next = prev->next;
+ WRITE_ONCE(prev, next);
+ WRITE_ONCE(next, prev->next);
plist_check_prev_next(top, prev, next);
}
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists