linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] header fix for riscv build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=whMS56xLhb7cAmTri2sXtGxK_zKWhZVX87YzjwAfVqTqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 14:46:04 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] header fix for riscv build failure

On Sun, 26 May 2024 at 10:03, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> Hi Linus, this fixes a riscv randconfig build failure from memory
> allocation profiling...

This pull request is odd in multiple ways.

 (a) it's unsigned, and I really don't pull from unsigned sources any more

 (b) the commit message is strange. It says "bcachefs", but I don't see why

 (c) you say riscv randconfig in the pull request but then when I
follow the links in the commit, it says "mips-randconfig". Maybe the
same thing ends up happening elsewhere too - including riscv - but it
sure is confusing and I suspect it was just a typo.

 (d) there's no "Fixes:" tag, so then I had to go and look up that
this wasn't stable material (it doesn't seem to be, the "Fixes" tag
would seem to be 24e44cc22aa3 ("mm: percpu: enable per-cpu allocation
tagging") from the current merge window

All of which means that I ended up just fetching the patch, fixing up
the commit message, and applying it manually instead.

             Linus