[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce266282-029f-4333-9ef8-6ddce64e661f@web.de>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 11:20:23 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Shichao Lai <shichaorai@...il.com>, usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
Xingwei Lee <xrivendell7@...il.com>, Yue Sun <samsun1006219@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v6] usb-storage: alauda: Check whether the media is initialized
>> …
>>> Fixes: e80b0fade09e ("[PATCH] USB Storage: add alauda support")
>>
>> How do you think about to omit the text “[PATCH] ” from the tag summary?
>
> Then it would be incorrect.
I find this view interesting.
> Again, Markus, please STOP sending review comments that are obviously wrong.
The mentioned tag needs an “one line summary”.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n145
Do you find it required to repeat a questionable commit subject completely?
> New developers do not know who to ignore and you are telling
> them things that are wrong and not helpful at all.
Additional development views can occasionally become helpful.
> Please stop reviewing patches,
Patch review is one of the usual software development activities.
> this is not ok
I suggest to reconsider such a view once more.
> is actually harmful to our community.
Possible improvements are varying between affected software components.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists