linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: cve Korean translation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 08:55:33 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Yunseong Kim <yskelg@...il.com>
Cc: skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Jinwoo Park <pmnxis@...il.com>, Austin Kim
 <austindh.kim@...il.com>, shjy180909@...il.com, workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: cve Korean translation

Yunseong Kim <yskelg@...il.com> writes:

> On 5/27/24 10:50 오후, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Yunseong Kim <yskelg@...il.com> writes:
>> 
>>>> 1) Why do I have three versions of it in my mailbox, sent over a period
>>>>    of 13 minutes?  What changed between the versions?
>>>
>>> Sorry, I forgot the name of the reviewer when I first sent the
>>> documentation content related patch version 2.
>> 
>> Which is fine, but...
>> 
>>>>    Normally, you want to wait for reviews to come in on one version
>>>>    before posting the next, and you should put a comment after the "---"
>>>>    line saying what changed.
>>>>
>>>> 2) When did this review from Jinwoo Park happen?  I was not copied on
>>>>    that.
>> 
>> You did not answer this question.  Reviews should generally be done in
>> public, but that does not seem to have happened here?
>
> Oops, sorry about that, Jonathan.
>
> Jinwoo Park sent me the review below, and I've updated some of ambiguous
> words in patch version 2.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/57f0d90c-4cc6-4418-ab79-6ae026d8ae09@gmail.com/T/#t

It does look like the patch was reviewed, but no Reviewed-by tag was
offered.  *Never* apply a Reviewed-by tag that has not been explicitly
given to you.

Jinwoo, would you like to offer that tag for this patch?

Thanks,

jon