[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240526203318.01ee176e@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 20:33:18 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark
Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Mathieu Desnoyers
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>, Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Sven
Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Jiri
Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Daniel
Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] function_graph: Use bitmask to loop on fgraph
entry
On Mon, 27 May 2024 09:09:49 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Note, we do not care about races. If a bit is set before the gops is
> > assigned, it only wastes time looking at the element and ignoring it (as
> > it did before this bitmask is added).
>
> This is OK because anyway we check gops == &fgraph_stub.
> By the way, shouldn't we also make "if (gops == &fgraph_stub)"
> check unlikely()?
Yeah, I'll add the unlikely() here too.
>
> This change looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Thanks for the review Masami!
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists