[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <80afc0fd-75ec-496a-a1f1-46df62805390@csgroup.eu>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 05:16:57 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jason Gunthorpe
<jgg@...dia.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Michael Ellerman
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 05/16] powerpc/mm: Fix __find_linux_pte() on 32
bits with PMD leaf entries
Le 27/05/2024 à 06:55, Oscar Salvador a écrit :
> On Sun, May 26, 2024 at 11:22:25AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> Building on 32 bits with pmd_leaf() not returning always false leads
>> to the following error:
>>
>> CC arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.o
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c: In function '__find_linux_pte':
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:506:1: error: function may return address of local variable [-Werror=return-local-addr]
>> 506 | }
>> | ^
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>> 394 | pud_t pud, *pudp;
>> | ^~~
>> arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c:394:15: note: declared here
>>
>> This is due to pmd_offset() being a no-op in that case.
>>
>> So rework it for powerpc/32 so that pXd_offset() are used on real
>> pointers and not on on-stack copies.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
>
> Maybe this could be folded into the patch that makes pmd_leaf() not returning
> always false, but no strong feelings:
I prefer to keep it separate, the patch introducing pmd_leaf() is
already big enough.
>
> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists