linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/14] alpha: cleanups for 6.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 00:49:16 +0100 (BST)
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>
cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, 
    Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
    Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>, 
    Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>, 
    Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, 
    Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, 
    Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, 
    "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
    Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>, Frank Scheiner <frank.scheiner@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] alpha: cleanups for 6.10

On Fri, 3 May 2024, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

> > I had investigated dropping support for alpha EV5 and earlier a while
> > ago after noticing that this is the only supported CPU family
> > in the kernel without native byte access and that Debian has already
> > dropped support for this generation last year [1] after it turned
> > out to be broken.
> 
> That's not quite correct. Support for older Alphas is not broken and
> always worked when I tested it. It's just that some people wanted to
> raise the baseline in order to improve code performance on newer machines
> with the hope to fix some minor issues we saw on Alpha here and there.

 I'm not quite happy to see pre-EV5 support go as EV45 is all the Alpha 
hardware I have and it's only owing to issues with the firmware of my 
console manager hardware that I haven't deployed it at my lab yet for 
Linux and GNU toolchain verification.  I'd rather I wasn't stuck with an 
obsolete version of Linux.

> > This topic came up again when Paul E. McKenney noticed that
> > parts of the RCU code already rely on byte access and do not
> > work on alpha EV5 reliably, so I refreshed my series now for
> > inclusion into the next merge window.
> 
> Hrrrm? That sounds like like Paul ran tests on EV5, did he?

 What exactly is required to make it work?

  Maciej