[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae768bb2-cb96-4a05-8752-66bc6bfdab1b@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 10:56:39 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>,
Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,sa8775p-pas:
Document the SA8775p ADSP, CDSP and GPDSP
On 27/05/2024 10:43, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>
> Document the components used to boot the ADSP, CDSP0, CDSP1, GPDSP0 and
> GPDSP1 on the SA8775p SoC.
>
> Co-developed-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>
Missing SoB.
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
..
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/qcom,pas-common.yaml#
> +
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - qcom,sa8775p-adsp-pas
> + then:
> + properties:
> + power-domains:
> + items:
> + - description: LCX power domain
> + - description: LMX power domain
> + power-domain-names:
> + items:
> + - const: lcx
> + - const: lmx
> +
> + - if:
> + properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - qcom,sa8775p-cdsp-pas
cdsp0
> + then:
> + properties:
> + power-domains:
> + items:
> + - description: CX power domain
> + - description: MXC power domain
> + - description: NSP0 power domain
> + power-domain-names:
> + items:
> + - const: cx
> + - const: mxc
> + - const: nsp0
Shouldn't this be just nsp, so both cdsp0 and cdsp1 entries can be
unified? That's the power domain from the device point of view, so the
device expects to be in some NSP domain, not explicitly NSPn.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists