[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a28df276-069c-4d4d-abaf-efc24983211e@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 19:43:10 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel_team@...ynix.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
vernhao@...cent.com, mgorman@...hsingularity.net, hughd@...gle.com,
willy@...radead.org, david@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
luto@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, rjgolo@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/12] LUF(Lazy Unmap Flush) reducing tlb numbers over
90%
On 5/26/24 18:57, Byungchul Park wrote:
..
> Plus, I will add another give-up at code changing the permission of vma
> to writable.
I suspect you have a much more general problem on your hands. Just
tweaking the VFS or mmap() code likely isn't going to cut it.
I guess we'll see what you come up with next, but this email was really
just the result of Vlastimil and I chatting on IRC for five minutes
about this set.
It has absolutely not been tested nor reviewed enough. <fud>I hope the
performance gains stick around once more of the bugs are gone.</fud>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists