linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZlSDQssA9I4LRjwM@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2024 13:57:38 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Cc: Ron Economos <re@...z.net>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	regressions@...ts.linux.dev, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev

On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 01:16:06PM +0200, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote:
> On 27.05.24 12:45, Ron Economos wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:09:14PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 11:47:55AM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> >> > Report an error when an attempt to register a clkdev entry results in a
> >> > truncated string so the problem can be easily spotted.
> >> >
> >> > Reported by: Duanqiang Wen <duanqiangwen@...-swift.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> >> > Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> With this patch in the mainline kernel, I get
> >> [...]
> >> when trying to boot sifive_u in qemu.
> >>
> >> Apparently, "10000000.clock-controller" is too long. Any suggestion on
> >> how to solve the problem ? I guess using dev_name(dev) as dev_id
> > parameter
> >> for clk_hw_register_clkdev() is not or no longer a good idea.
> >> What else should be used instead ?
> > 
> > This issue causes a complete boot failure on real hardware (SiFive
> > Unmatched).
> 
> Hmmm. That and because nobody afaics has time/motivation to fix this
> anytime soon (or am I mistaken there?) makes me wonder if we should
> revert this change for now (and remerge it later once the problem this
> change exposed was fixed). Or is another solution in sight somewhere?

I'm sorry, but clearly I should tell my employer that I can't do work
for them because there's been a mainline kernel regression, and of
course I should be working on this bank holiday Monday...

No, please wait a bit longer.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!